Most studies on piracy ask college students. This one asked real adults. The findings, drawn from Kos Koklic, Vida, Bajde and Culiberg (2014), reveal a simple chain: how people feel about the harm, how much they fear the tech risk, what attitude they form, and what they end up doing.
Two forces feed into a person's attitude toward piracy. That attitude then drives intent. Involvement (how much the topic matters to you) decides how strong that final link actually is.
Standardised path coefficients from Kos Koklic et al. (2014), Table 3.
The research splits the cost of piracy into two clean buckets. One looks outward at society. The other looks inward at the pirate's own machine.
Also called moral intensity. It captures the harm done to creators, studios, labels, and the wider creative economy.
Called perceived technical risk. Not lawyers or fines, but what happens on your own machine when you grab a sketchy file.